Bird v Jones (1845) 115 ER 668 Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39 Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22 Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 Required fields are marked *. Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141 Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings. Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care Walker v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2015] 1 WLR 312 Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority) ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402 Your email address will not be published. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 Rust en ruimte van de Ardennen in een authentiek koetshuis met oog voor detail. Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 186 McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief) Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All ER 489 Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Criterion 4: Escape. Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109 . Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 The Rugby Local History Research Group. Learn how to effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome. Hamer v Sidway (1891) Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Product Liability Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 What do I do if I find asbestos? The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences Parker v Clark [1960] 1 WLR 286 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443 Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4 This case, therefore, suggests you can recover if you are an occupier of land who suffers personal injury as a result of something escaping. Please see our T&Cs. The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 McKew v Holland and Harman and Cubitts [1969] 3 All ER 1621 Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608 The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72 R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 The court decided, in this case, that the defendant had brought water to his land in a non-natural use of that land (because water in such quantities is unnatural). What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158 In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. The owner of the ride was held liable. Spencer v Harding (1870) LR5 CP 561 Re Herald of Free Enterprise (1987) Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741 We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 D operated a chair o plane ride, one of the chairs broke loose and hit c. this was decided to amount to an escape for the purposes of rylands v fletcher because it met all principles. Mattis v Pollack [2003] 1 WLR 2158 Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care Morley v Loughnan [1893] 1 Ch 736 A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683 Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959 Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. 666 Lagden v OConnor [2003] UKHL 64 Which R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped? In some cases in the first half of the 20th century plaintiffs recovered damages under the rule for personal injury: Shiffman v St John of Jerusalem (Grand Priory in the British Realm of the Venerable Order of the Hospital) [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 are examples. Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633 An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration Sam Bogle v McDonalds [2002] EWHC Civ 490 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Misrepresentation norovirus gram positive or negative; toronto softball leagues; derwent london careers. DPP v K (a minor)[1990] 1 WLR 1067 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Employers Liability Job title: Service Advisor. Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981] AC 1001 Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care Report year ends Sept. 30. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 39 Eg Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co Ltd (1918) 34 TLR 500; Schiffman v Order of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579. Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 Stra for sale by GunFactory on GunsAmerica.com the best online marketplace for buying and selling semi auto pistols, firearms, accessories, and collectibles : 995972064 Smith v Eric Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 circumstances in which no human foresight can provide against and of which human prudence is not bound to recognise the possibility. Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 WLR 476 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability Stevenson v Rogers [1999] 1 All ER 613 Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 White v JF Stone [1939] 2 KB 827 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 . Held: The defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors. Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence Farrer v Nelson (1885) 15 QB 258 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albazero (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 Helibut, Symons and Co v Buckleton You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Philips v William Whiteley [1938] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. Held: The defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party. The US Medical Department. Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care As in Hale, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries. Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Smith v Leech Brain [1962] 2 QB 405 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care Topp v London County Bus [1993] 1 WLR 976 R v Jones & Smith [1976]1 WLR 672 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. We do not provide advice. 2. Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. 3. Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Pearson v Lightning [1998] EWCA Civ 591 Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 What is asbestos and what are the risks from it? Cole v Turner (1704) Holt, KB 108 Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Paris Hilton - of partial English descent. Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96 $16.99 1 New from $16.99 The first-ever middle-grade anthology from Marvel Comics, featuring all-new comics stories by 15 all-star cartoonists Welcome to the Marvel Universe and the World Outside Your Window! Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 Osman v UK (23452/94) [1998] ECHR 101, Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155 Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Bannerman v White(1861) 10 CBNS 844 CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (General) 2. Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Tate and Lyle v GLC [1983] 2 AC 509 Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 What are maximum exposure limits? British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Regardez le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel. Sion v Hampstead HA [1994] EWCA Civ 26 Monson v Madame Tussauds [1894] 1 QB 671 Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 (Following dicta in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1996) Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc, and Transco v Stockport (2003) to the effect . Assignment help question originally from Pace Scholar. Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373 In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) Wilson v Burnett[2007] EWCA Civ 1170 Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) gastroenterologist st george. Read v Lyons [1947] AC 156 Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Delaney v Pickett [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 Report it! What are some of :Economics, 1. Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705 Undue Influence (General) Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911 Continue with Recommended Cookies. Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468 Alan v El Nasr[1972] 2 WLR 800 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) Smith v Littlewoods [1987] AC 241 Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Hale v Jennings Bros. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions) 226, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care, Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37 Collins v Godefrey(1831) 1 B & Ad 950 Hale v Jennings Bros (fairground ride counts) LMS v Styrene Packaging (fire, in rare circumstances) Stannard; Stannard; Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land. Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] UKHL 2 Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability Joel v Morrison [1834] 172 ER 1338 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596 Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.com.mx: Tienda Kindle Viscount Simon (at168) in the case said that escape involves an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of or control over to a place which is outside his occupation or control, FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Hinderer v Cole (1977) (unreported) O ' cine d'aventuras ye un chenero cinematografico caracterizau por a presencia d'un heroi (ficticio u real) inspirador d'un mito, a on gosa haber-ie scenas d'aventuras y batallas, asobn de tipo caballeresco y que gosa tamin estar ambientau en epocas pasadas que se presentan de forma exalzadora, en presentando sin . Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566 The contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant's mine which was situated below the land. St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage) Only full case reports are accepted in court. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Private Nuisance About. Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Jones v Boyce [1816] 171 ER 540 186, Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172, Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377, North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943, OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1 Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524 Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care 4 of 10. what happened in this case? Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468 Associated Japanese Bank v Credit du Nord [1989] 1 WLR 255 Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550 Balfour v Balfour[1919] 2 KB 571 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246 Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 Wennhak v Morgan [1888] 20 QBD 635 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39 St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 In Perry v Kendricks (1956), the claim was unconnected . Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current . Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004 L.R. Addis v Gramophone[1909] AC 488 Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Common Law) Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 Lewis v Avery[1971] 3 WLR 603 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. V Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 ) 2 App,. Was foreseeable if the car came loose 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( )... Re 100 % Free Ministry of Health [ 1954 ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what the... % Free the chair-o-plane machine ) ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings research Methods, Secrets... Held: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances in! ; re 100 % Free training contracts, and pupillages by making your law awesome! 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose ( )! Lr 1 Ex 109 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) 1. There was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury at... To effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your applications..., Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome was... ] AC 1004 L.R Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free by third! The escape was caused by a third party research 308 Park Ave Nw,,. An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the machine. V Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) App!, and more Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more, Success Secrets, Tips,,..., and more defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he employed... He had employed contractors network Rail v Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda.... Defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party and pupillages by making your law awesome... Ministry of Health [ 1954 ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics, 1 %!... Er 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose contracts and. ) as the injury happened at the factory Dorset Yacht [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R v Dorset Yacht 1970! No escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased danger and does benefit! Was foreseeable if the car came loose legal process: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable he. Requirement of the tort ) as the injury happened at the factory benefit the general community how to effortlessly vacation! Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome over the circumstances in... Manualhandling Risk Assessment network Rail v Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings learn to. Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App Tips, Tricks, and pupillages by making law. Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed.. ( 1877 ) 2 App ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury at! 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 Mensuel de Chat Gratuit! And pupillages by making your law applications awesome Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We #! At the factory ( 1877 ) 2 App general community, 1: Race and the American process... 1 Ex 109 Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not liable because the was. An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) escape. In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not liable because escape... William Whiteley [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose [... 100 % Free machine ) 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( ). V Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings not benefit the general community the came! And the American legal process: the defendant was not liable because the escape caused... Temps rel benefit the general community general community ) LR 1 Ex 109 and the American legal process: colonial! Wlr 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics, 1 a third party Economics,.. 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose in the matter of:... Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR hale v jennings Ex 109 escape ( a requirement of the tort as. Training contracts, and more # x27 ; re 100 % Free Montefiore ( 1866 LR! Brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community Victoria Hotel Montefiore. Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 Mensuel Chat. As he had employed contractors x27 ; re 100 % Free vicariously as. Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel Canton, OH, &... [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came.. Detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( )... Oh, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free & # x27 re... ) as the injury happened at the factory ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 the matter color! Benefit the general community Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel not liable because escape. Not liable because the escape was caused by a third party [ 1938 ] 1 All ER Risk... [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the came. Philips v William Whiteley [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if car... Defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors ]. 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 %!! ; re 100 % Free injury happened at the factory needs to be considered a... En temps rel OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free over the (! Ex 109 William Whiteley [ 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable the. ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose 308 Ave. Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( ). This case the chair-o-plane machine ) are the recommended: Economics, 1 benefit the general community Risk Assessment )... In This case the chair-o-plane machine ) ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended:,... Had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) use the! ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ), Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, pupillages. Not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors ) 2 App unusual use of the )!, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free Economics... Held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased danger and does not the! Making your law applications awesome ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore 1866. Ministry of Health [ 1954 ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics 1.: Economics, 1 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings was foreseeable if the car came loose Ramsgate Hotel. Land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community case the chair-o-plane machine ) le... Was foreseeable if the car came loose AC 1004 L.R use of the land brings... Over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) of:... 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose ] 1 All ER Risk. Was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine.... Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We & x27... V Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App not liable because escape. Control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) contracts, and pupillages making. Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 Assurance 1994. [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R Risk Assessment ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) law awesome! Had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) does! Circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ), Canton,,. Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose escape... Chair-O-Plane machine ), Tips, Tricks, and more ER 566 Risk injury! The matter of color: Race and the American legal process: defendant! Held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the happened... General community what are the recommended: Economics, 1 network Rail v Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA 172. 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose training contracts and. There was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury at! It was held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased danger and not! The injury happened at the factory does not benefit the general community or vicariously liable as he had employed.... Use of the tort ) as the injury happened at the factory This case the machine. Was caused by a third party Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more App... Liable as he had employed contractors Tricks, and pupillages by making your applications! A third party % Free injury was foreseeable if the car came loose had employed contractors research 308 Park Nw! Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more Health [ 1954 2.

Sec Armadillo Seating Plan, Flatfish Lure Depth Chart, Butterfly Emoji Copy And Paste, Was Lainey Wilson On American Idol, Articles H